Competition between the United States and China is internal competition quickchm

Competition between the United States and China is internal competition quickchm

The competition is the competition between China and the United States "strength" the opinion leader of sina finance (WeChat public kopleader) columnist Wang Wen appeared in the reference news Sino US structural power shift and mode of military conflict is not to Thucydides trap set by, but who can solve domestic problems as shaft mounted on. The future of China and the United States who have the right to speak in the global order, the key is not who can win in the war between the two countries, but who can create a better society. The competition is the competition between China and the US "internal" facts have proved that due to the numerous, ancient Greek historian Thucydides in "history of the Peloponnesian War" in a book called "the rise of the country and the conservative hegemony between war inevitable" hypothesis is formed the historical experience of the special times and part of the region based on the summary of the logic with strong Western color the center and realism of international relations theory. In 1980s, the American writer Herman Walker wrote "Thucydides trap warning of the cold war consequences. In August 22, 2012, Harvard University professor Allison Gram in the British "Financial Times" to "Historical Metaphor Thucydides trap" is a word, the resurgence of the western academic circle especially in the United States of American decline and the rise of China anxiety, worry, become a hot topic for the current international research and great game. In this regard, only to let the global historical observation and the era of comprehensive thinking and complete, to break the American anxiety "self fulfilling prophecy" hypothesis, the theory of "Sino US beyond the curse of Thucydides trap". "The Thucydides trap" is some western scholars’ self chest read "power wars" realism that occupies an important position in the western international relations theory. However, whether it is Morgenthau’s "national politics", or Paul Kennedy’s "great powers", most western scholars of classical theory described the historical sources, are limited to the European powers in 1500 after the rise and fall of process, is the station of fiction to the country threat since the rise in the hegemonic position. Break the space-time interval, the "big wars" is a self chest read. Western scholars used to the extent of "since 1500", the description has appeared 16 times against the conservative powers and emerging countries, 12 of which eventually led to the war, the remaining 4 times to avoid war. But careful study found that, not all against all have a connection with the "hegemony". From the rise of the United States starts at the end of nineteenth Century and the war did not happen, and the conservative British hegemony instead, and fought in the first World War, World War II; the second half of twentieth Century, the Soviet Union and US global hegemony, and there has not been a military war; Germany after World War II, Japan and the United States in the region rise, it never happened war. And in twentieth Century, and the conservative hegemony of the United States military war, such as Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, has no intention and no power and American hegemony. The whole history of the world, the most conservative hegemony decline is not triggered by the rising power of war. Take China as an example相关的主题文章: